D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Gray
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1905, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Merchants' State Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co. (Minn. 1905)
- Berryhill v. Carney (Minn. 1899)
- Simpkins v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1894)
- Merriman v. Bowen (Minn. 1886)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Where, in a bill of costs offered for adjustment, are items for witnesses who, for any cause, were not sworn, if the items are objected to, an affidavit showing the attendance and travel of the witnesses, and stating that they were “necessary and material,” is not sufficient. There must be an affidavit stating facts which show the necessity of having them in attendance, which affidavit the party may furnish when the items are objected to.
Judgment affirmed.
Dickinson, J., because of illness, took no part in this decision.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.