Scheffler v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Scheffler v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.
Opinion of the Court
The action is brought by 'a father to recover for the killing, through the alleged negligence of the defendant, of his son, a child 17 months old, whereby the plaintiff, as he alleges, has been and will be deprived of the services of said son. The statute provides: “A cause of action arising out of an injury to the person dies with the person of either party.” Gen. St. 1878, c. 77, § 1.. This is only declaratory of the rule at common law. Insurance Co. v. Brame, 95 U. S. 754, and cases cited; Carey v. Berkshire R. Co., 1 Cush. 475. The statute (Gen. St. 1878, c. 77, § 2,) creates a cause of action when death is caused by the wrongful act or omission of
Order reversed.
Dickinson, J., because of illness, took no part in this decision.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Anton Scheffler v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company
- Cited By
- 10 cases
- Status
- Published