Craver v. Christian
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1885, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Boright v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance (Minn. 1885)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The question upon this appeal is whether the trial court erred in dismissing the action upon the ground that the evidence was not such as to entitle plaintiff to have it submitted to the jury.. The settled case does not purport to contain all the evidence, and defendant insists that for this reason this court cannot properly consider the question stated. We can see no way to escape this conclusion. The appeal seems to stand upon the same footing as an appeal from an order refusing a new trial, moved for on the ground that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict, when the settled case-does not show that it contains all the evidence. In such a state of the record we have often held that the question of insufficiency of evidence cannot be considered.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.