Stoll v. Houde
Stoll v. Houde
34 Minn. 193; 25 N.W. 63; 1885 Minn. LEXIS 188
(Minnesota Reports)
Stoll v. Houde
Opinion of the Court
The language of the alleged libel, as pleaded, plainly shows on its face that it was used of and concerning the plaintiff in his official character of county treasurer. Therefore it was unnecessary that the complaint should contain an express averment that it was so used. When taken in connection with the allegations that the Hays mentioned — a former deputy county treasurer — was an em
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.