Thorp v. Lorenz
Minnesota Supreme Court
Thorp v. Lorenz, 34 Minn. 350 (Minn. 1885)
25 N.W. 712; 1885 Minn. LEXIS 244
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
- —
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Thorp v. Lorenz
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order made on the trial dismissing the action, on the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action. It has been repeatedly held by this court that an order of this kind is not appealable. Rogers v. Holyoke, 14 Minn. 387, (514;) Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 385, (513;) Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 285, (316.) The plaintiff should either have moved for a new trial and appealed from the order refusing it, or else caused judgment of dismissal to have been entered, and then appealed from the judgment.
Appeal dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- D. M. Thorp v. Joseph Lorenz
- Cited By
- 13 cases
- Status
- Published