Hornsby v. Hause
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1921, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Bergh v. Stanek (Minn. 1921)
- Baker v. Brundage (Minn. 1915)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The trial court found that Clark & Co., who acted as defendant’s agents in the sale of the property in question, had no authority from the defendant to make the contract of sale to enforce which this action is brought. The contract, by its terms, purported to bind the defendant to convey the land for the consideration of $1,400, — one-half cash, and the balance to be paid in one and two years, with interest. The evidence in respect to the price and terms of sale authorized by the defendant is conflicting. The evidence on his part tended to show that a sale was authorized by him on the condition that the purchaser should pay $1,400, and assume a mortgage
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.