Minnesota Supreme Court, 1887

Morrill v. Madden

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided July 25, 1887

37 Minn. 282; 34 N.W. 25; 1887 Minn. LEXIS 108 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Saiuyer, Abbott é Sawyer, for appellant., P. McGovern and Lovely, Morgan do Morgan, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1888, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Dole v. Wilson (Minn. 1888)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This ease, as now presented by an amended complaint, is deemed to be in no essential respect different from that-shown by the original complaint, which, upon a former appeal, was-decided to be insufficient to entitle the plaintiff to a remedy upon a judgment, after it had been suffered to expire by lapse of time. Mor*283rill v. Madden, 35 Minn. 493, (29 N. W. Rep. 193.) For reasons set forth in our opinion in that case, the order sustaining this demurrer is affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.