Minnesota Supreme Court, 1887

Morrill v. Madden

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided July 25, 1887

37 Minn. 282; 34 N.W. 25; 1887 Minn. LEXIS 108 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Saiuyer, Abbott é Sawyer, for appellant., P. McGovern and Lovely, Morgan do Morgan, for respondent.

Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This ease, as now presented by an amended complaint, is deemed to be in no essential respect different from that-shown by the original complaint, which, upon a former appeal, was-decided to be insufficient to entitle the plaintiff to a remedy upon a judgment, after it had been suffered to expire by lapse of time. Mor*283rill v. Madden, 35 Minn. 493, (29 N. W. Rep. 193.) For reasons set forth in our opinion in that case, the order sustaining this demurrer is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.