In re the Assignment of Fuller
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1920, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Boyum v. Jordan (Minn. 1920)
- Mullen v. Ellington (Minn. 1897)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This appeal is from an order of the district court requiring and directing creditors to file their claims against certain insolvent debtors, with releases thereof, as provided by Laws 1881, c. 148, § 10, within a prescribed period of time, or be forever barred from claiming any benefit under an assignment made by said debtors of all of their property not exempt from seizure and sale upon execution in trust for the benefit of all of their creditors. The deed of assignment does not differ in form from that considered in Re Bird, 39 Minn. 520, (40 N.W. Rep. 827.) The facts may have warranted an assignment by the terms of which releases could have been exacted as a condition for participating in the trust funds, but such an assignment was not made. For the reasons stated in the case just referred to, the order must be modified. It is quite evident, however, from the record, that the point upon which our decision is based was not presented by the appellants upon the argument below. The order appealed from is vacated in so far as it requires creditors to file releases with their claims.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.