Kenyon v. Semon

Minnesota Supreme Court
Kenyon v. Semon, 43 Minn. 180 (Minn. 1890)
45 N.W. 10; 1890 Minn. LEXIS 146
Mitchell

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 6 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Kenyon v. Semon

Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.

The practice of designating the parties, either plaintiff or defendant, by the initials of their Christian names, is irregular, and has been more than once disapproved by this court; but it is no ground for the dismissal of the complaint or for a reversal of the judgment. The proper remedy, in such a case, is by motion to require the complaint to be amended or corrected in that respect. The other question sought to be raised is not involved in this appeal, at least on the present record.

Order and judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Albert H. Kenyon and another v. William H. Semon, impleaded, etc.
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published