Minnesota Supreme Court, 1891

Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided June 11, 1891 · Gilfillan

46 Minn. 330; 48 N.W. 1132; 1891 Minn. LEXIS 319 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Flannery <& Cooke and Jackson & Atwater, for appellant., Albert F. Clarke and W. F. Booth, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1894, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Opinion of the Court

Gilfillan, C. J.

So far as the defendant relies for a defence upon dedication of the real estate to public use, and the right of plaintiff to bringejeetment, the questions are disposed of by the opinion in Watson v. Chicago, Mil. & St. Paul Ry. Co., supra, p. 321.

Order reversed.

Note. A motion for veargument of this case was denied July 1, 1891.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.