Minnesota Supreme Court, 1891

Lathrop v. O'Brien

Lathrop v. O'Brien
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided November 30, 1891 · Collins
47 Minn. 428; 50 N.W. 530; 1891 Minn. LEXIS 523 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Fred. B. Lathrop, for appellant., G. P. Gregory, for respondent. ■

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1917, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Lathrop v. O'Brien

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Collins, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order vacating a judgment in bis favor entered on default, and permitting an answer. The defendant’s laches was sufficiently excused, aind the proposed answer, although somewhat loosely drawn, upon its face stated a defence, the truth or falsity of which could not properly be determined upon conflicting ex parte affidavits, on plaintiff’s contention that the proposed answer was sham. There was no abuse of discretion on the part of the court granting the order appealed from.

Affirmed.

jSTote. A motion for a reargument of this case was 'denied December 17, 1891.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.