Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co. v. Heipler
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1926, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 2008)
- Citizens State Bank v. E. A. Tessman & Co. (Minn. 1913)
- First State Bank of Ely v. Seliskar (Minn. 1926)
- Baglin v. Earl-Eagle Mining Co. (Utah 1919)
- Stewart v. Price (Kan. 1902)
- Bush v. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. (Okla. 1922)
- Citizens' Bank v. Corkings (S.D. 1897)
- Haupt Lumber Co. v. Westman (Minn. 1892)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
By the terms of the order or draft sued on, the drawer directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff a certain sum.
The defendant. accepted the draft, expressly agreeing to pay the plaintiff the sum named. Clearly the plaintiff held the legal title to the demand, and was the real party in interest.
It did not concern the defendant that there was an agreement between the drawer and the plaintiff that the latter took the order only for collection; the proceeds, when collected, to be applied on-the indebtedness of the former to the latter.
No exceptions were taken on the trial of the cause which raise any cither question.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.