Doty v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Ry. Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court
Doty v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Ry. Co., 49 Minn. 499 (Minn. 1892)
52 N.W. 135; 1892 Minn. LEXIS 210
Gilbtllan

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 6 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Doty v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Ry. Co.

Opinion of the Court

Gilbtllan, C. J.

There was not a particle of evidence in the case from which the jury might determine that any agent of the defend*500ant had made any fraudulent representation to plaintiff to induce her to execute the release pleaded in defense. What was said to her by Dr. Millard was merely the expression of his opinion as to the cure of her injury, and there is nothing to suggest the opinion was not given with the utmost good faith. There is nothing in either assignment of .error.

(Opinlon published 52 N. W. Rep. 135.)

Order affirmed.-

Reference

Full Case Name
Lucy M. Doty v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Ry. Co.
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published