Minnesota Supreme Court, 1892

Burke v. Baldwin

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 29, 1892 · Mitchell

51 Minn. 181; 53 N.W. 460; 1892 Minn. LEXIS 36 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Edson & Hanks, and J. W. Ball, for appellants., W. W. Billson, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1892, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Plummer v. Hatton (Minn. 1892)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.

This is controlled by the decision in Burke v. Backus, ante, p. 174, (53 N. W. Rep. 458,) and the result is that the judgment appealed from is reversed.

(Opinion published 53 N. W. Rep. 460.)

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.