Reynolds v. Curtiss

Minnesota Supreme Court
Reynolds v. Curtiss, 53 Minn. 257 (Minn. 1893)
55 N.W. 543; 1893 Minn. LEXIS 316
Gilfillan, Took, Vanderburgh

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Reynolds v. Curtiss

Opinion of the Court

Gilfillan, C. J.

The court below having found against the .allegation that there was an agreement extending the time for redemption, there is no basis for any of the questions of law raised; .and the evidence was such as to justify the' court’s finding of fact.

Order affirmed.

Vanderburgh, J., took no part in this decision,

(Opinion published 55 N. W. Rep. 543.)

Reference

Full Case Name
Wilbur S. Reynolds v. Sydney H. Curtiss
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published