Reynolds v. Curtiss
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1893, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Wentworth v. Tubbs (Minn. 1893)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The court below having found against the .allegation that there was an agreement extending the time for redemption, there is no basis for any of the questions of law raised; .and the evidence was such as to justify the' court’s finding of fact.
Order affirmed.
(Opinion published 55 N. W. Rep. 543.)
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.