L. Kimball Printing Co. v. Northwestern Guaranty Loan Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1893, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- State v. Ahern (Minn. 1893)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
There is nothing in this case but a question of fact, upon which the evidence amply justified the findings. As suggested by the trial judge, the entire controversy was whether one Channel, as agent of defendant, had authority, actual or apparent, to order from plaintiff the printed matter, for the value of which this action was brought. It is suggested that there was no evidence that the item of circulars was for defendant’s business, but we can see no substantial difference between that item and the remainder of the account.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.