Wilsins v. Sherwood
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1937, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Estate of Jordan (Minn. 1937)
- Murray v. Calkins (Minn. 1932)
- Marcus v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security (Minn. 1916)
- Hayward v. Larrabee (Minn. 1908)
- Bisseberg v. Ree (Minn. 1906)
- Watkins v. Landon (Minn. 1897)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We think the decision of this court in the action of Haas v. Billings, 42 Minn. 63, (43 N. W. Rep. 797,) controls the questions raised by the demurrer in this case, and the doctrine there' stated should be considered as the settled law in regard to that class of cases. The complaint in this action does not fully set' out the material facts necessary in a complaint in an action brought under 1878 G. S. ch. 66, § 285, but we place our decision upon the rules of law as laid down in Hass v. Billings.
The order of the court below sustaining the defendant’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint is affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.