Minnesota Supreme Court, 1893

St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels

St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 27, 1893 · Buce
55 Minn. 155; 56 N.W. 592; 1893 Minn. LEXIS 168 (Minnesota Reports)

St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels

Opinion of the Court

Buce, J.

The motion of the respondent to dismiss the appeal in this action must be sustained. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace. Issue was joined, and plaintiff recovered judgment against Mary Karels for $15 and costs. She appealed to the district court upon questions of law alone. There the judg*157ment of tbe justice’s court was affirmed. She tbeu moved for a new trial in tbe district court, where tbe motion was denied, and sbe appeals to tbis court from tbe order denying a new trial. Such an order is not appealable. Dodge v. Bell, 37 Minn. 382, (34 N. W. Rep. 739.)

(Opinion published 66 N. W. Rep. 592.)

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.