Minnesota Supreme Court, 1893

St. Cloud Common Council v. Karels

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 27, 1893 · Buce

55 Minn. 155; 56 N.W. 592; 1893 Minn. LEXIS 168 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

M. D. 'Taylor, for the respondent, cited Ashton v. Thompson, 28 Minn. 330; Marvin v. Dutcher, 26 Minn. 391; Brown v. Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Go., 44 Minn. 322; Lockwood v. Bock, 46 Minn. 73., Oscar Taylor, for appellant, opposing, cited 1878 G. S. ck. 86, § 8, subd. 4.

Opinion of the Court

Buce, J.

The motion of the respondent to dismiss the appeal in this action must be sustained. The action was commenced before a justice of the peace. Issue was joined, and plaintiff recovered judgment against Mary Karels for $15 and costs. She appealed to the district court upon questions of law alone. There the judg*157ment of tbe justice’s court was affirmed. She tbeu moved for a new trial in tbe district court, where tbe motion was denied, and sbe appeals to tbis court from tbe order denying a new trial. Such an order is not appealable. Dodge v. Bell, 37 Minn. 382, (34 N. W. Rep. 739.)

(Opinion published 66 N. W. Rep. 592.)

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.