Minnesota Supreme Court, 1894

Tilley v. Cobb

Tilley v. Cobb
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided January 25, 1894 · Canty, Collins, Took, Tried
56 Minn. 295; 57 N.W. 799; 1894 Minn. LEXIS 46 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Francis G. Burke and George M. Bennett, for appellants., Edward Savage, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1914, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Tilley v. Cobb

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Collins, J.

The District Court in which this action was brought had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties. Its right and power, as wTell as its duty, to proceed to a trial after the Federal Court had refused to entertain the case, and had remanded it, ought not to be challenged. The ruling of the latter when remanding cannot be reviewed in the state courts. Judgment affirmed.

Canty, J, having tried the case as a District Judge, took no part»

(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 799.)

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.