Tilley v. Cobb

Minnesota Supreme Court
Tilley v. Cobb, 56 Minn. 295 (Minn. 1894)
57 N.W. 799; 1894 Minn. LEXIS 46
Canty, Collins, Took, Tried

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 3 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Tilley v. Cobb

Opinion of the Court

Collins, J.

The District Court in which this action was brought had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the parties. Its right and power, as wTell as its duty, to proceed to a trial after the Federal Court had refused to entertain the case, and had remanded it, ought not to be challenged. The ruling of the latter when remanding cannot be reviewed in the state courts. Judgment affirmed.

Canty, J, having tried the case as a District Judge, took no part»

(Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 799.)

Reference

Full Case Name
John J. Tilley v. Nelson Cobb
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published