Quelprud v. Kothe
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1894, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- In re Thompson's Estate (Minn. 1894)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
As was stated by the court below in its charge to the jury, no exception being taken thereto, the only dispute between the parties was whether plaintiff had been paid in full for his services, and on this the finding was in his favor. There was evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict, for we do not agree with counsel for defendant in his assertion that plaintiff’s testimony was so inconsistent, improbable, and contradictory that it should have been wholly rejected.
Order affirmed.
(Opinion published 58 N. W. 682.)
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.