Lytle v. Prescott
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1913, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Prosser v. Manley (Minn. 1913)
- Modern Woodmen of America v. Lane (Neb. 1901)
- Adams v. City of Thief River Falls (Minn. 1901)
- Rogers v. Truesdale (Minn. 1894)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Of the three assignments of error the first and third are bad under the rules, — the first, because it does not show whether it is taken to the court’s findings of fact or its conclusion of law, and, if to the findings of fact, it does not show to which of them (there being several); the third, because it assigns as error the denial of the motion for a new trial, without specifying to which of the several points made by the motion the assignment applies. There is no merit in the second assignment of error. There was evidence to sustain the finding referred to in it. Order affirmed.
(Opinion published 58 N. W. 688.)
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.