Miller v. State Bank

Minnesota Supreme Court
Miller v. State Bank, 57 Minn. 319 (Minn. 1894)
59 N.W. 309; 1894 Minn. LEXIS 293
Book, Gilfillan, Sick, Took

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Miller v. State Bank

Opinion of the Court

Gilfillan, C. J.

Plaintiff was agent for Simon Clark & Co., and, as such, deposited money of theirs with defendant to the credit of himself, — “A. J. Miller, Agent.” Afterwards Simon Clark & Co. made an assignment in insolvency.

Whether plaintiff could or could not, while his agency continued, maintain -an action in his oavu name on the deposit, he certainly could not after his relation to the deposit ceased by the revocation of his agency with respect to it

*323The assignment of his principals, Simon Clark & Co., worked such revocation.

Order reversed.

Book, J., absent, sick, took no part.

(Opinion published 59 N. W. 309.)

Reference

Full Case Name
Allen J. Miller v. State Bank of Duluth
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published