Security Bank v. Northwestern Fuel Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1940, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
16 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sisseton Live Stock Shipping Ass'n v. Drovers State Bank (Minn. 1925)
- State v. Johnson (Minn. 1926)
- Rubio Savings Bank v. Acme Farm Products Co. (Iowa 1949)
- Adams County v. Meadows Valley Bank (Idaho 1929)
- Hjelle v. Veigel (Minn. 1926)
- Semingson v. Stock Yards National Bank (Minn. 1925)
- Acme Hay & Mill Feed Co. v. Metropolitan National Bank (Iowa 1924)
- St. Paul State Bank v. Rippe Grain & Milling Co. (Minn. 1924)
- Midwest National Bank & Trust Co. v. Niles & Watters Savings Bank (Iowa 1921)
- Stein v. Kemp (Minn. 1916)
- King v. Carroll-Porter Boiler & Tank Co. (Minn. 1898)
- W. A. White Brokerage Co. v. Cooperman (Minn. 1940)
- Weed v. Boston & Maine Railroad (Me. 1925)
- Alleman v. Sayre (W. Va. 1917)
- National Bank of America v. National Bank (Ill. 1897)
- Irwin v. McKechnie (Minn. 1894)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The defendant gave its check for $418.12 on the Bank of Minneapolis, payable to the order of the Mill Wood Company, which was a customer of, and had a deposit account with, the plaintiff, on which it was accustomed to deposit cash and checks, which were credited to its account, and against which it was authorized to draw its checks. On the same day on which the Mill Wood Company received the check it indorsed it, “For deposit in the Security Bank to the credit of the Mill Wood Company,” and deposited it, with other checks, with the plaintiff, receiving a deposit slip, and being credited with the amount on its deposit account. Immediately preceding this deposit the Mill Wood Company's account was overdrawn, but, after making this deposit, and another, made the same day, there was a balance to its credit of $876.30, including the credit for the check in question. The next morning it drew checks against its account, which were paid, which overdrew its account $363.72, and this overdraft has never been paid. Subsequently, on
Where a customer has a deposit account with a bank, on which he is accustomed to deposit checks payable to himself, which are credited to him on his account, and against which he is authorized to draw, an indorsement “For deposit” is, in the absence of a different understanding, a request and direction to deposit the sum to the credit of the customer, and passes the absolute title to the •check to the bank. Commercial Bank v. Miller, 77 Ala. 168; First Nat. Bank v. Smith, 132 Mass. 227.
Upon a deposit being made by a customer in a bank, in the ordinary course of business, of money, checks, drafts, or other negotiable paper received and credited as money, the title of the money, drafts, or other paper immediately becomes the property of the bank, which becomes debtor to the depositor for the amount, unless a different understanding affirmatively appears. In re State Bank, 56 Minn. 119, (57 N. W. 336.) There is nothing in this case indicating .any different understanding.
Order affirmed.
(Opinion published 59 N. W. 987.)
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.