Minnesota Supreme Court, 1894

Gederholm v. Davies

Gederholm v. Davies
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 30, 1894 · Collins
59 Minn. 1; 60 N.W. 676; 1894 Minn. LEXIS 100 (Minnesota Reports)

Gederholm v. Davies

Opinion of the Court

Collins, J.

"Whether the postponement of the hearing of plaintiff’s motion to strike out defendant’s answer as sham, and for judg*3ment, was regular or irregular, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed. The order for judgment was made on default, and, before appealing to this court, it was incumbent upon defendant’s counsel to apply for relief to the court making such order. Judgment affirmed.

(Opinion published 60 N. W. 676.)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.