Gederholm v. Davies

Minnesota Supreme Court
Gederholm v. Davies, 59 Minn. 1 (Minn. 1894)
60 N.W. 676; 1894 Minn. LEXIS 100
Collins

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Gederholm v. Davies

Opinion of the Court

Collins, J.

"Whether the postponement of the hearing of plaintiff’s motion to strike out defendant’s answer as sham, and for judg*3ment, was regular or irregular, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed. The order for judgment was made on default, and, before appealing to this court, it was incumbent upon defendant’s counsel to apply for relief to the court making such order. Judgment affirmed.

(Opinion published 60 N. W. 676.)

Reference

Full Case Name
Ole P. Gederholm v. N. T. Davies
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published