Minnesota Supreme Court, 1894

Allis v. White

Allis v. White
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided November 12, 1894 · Gilfillan, Took
59 Minn. 97; 60 N.W. 809; 1894 Minn. LEXIS 117 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

William G. White, pro se. , Wells é Hopp, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1921, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Allis v. White

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to change the place of trial, on the ground that defendant, at the time of the commencement of the action, resided, and still resides, in the county to which he asks to have the case removed, and not in the county in which the action is brought. Held, *99following Carpenter v. Comfort, 22 Minn. 539, that this order is not appealable, and this appeal should be dismissed. So ordered.

Gilfillan, C. J., took no part.

(Opinion published 60 N. W. 809.)

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.