Lloyd v. Secord
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1931, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- First Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Lancaster Corp. (Minn. 1931)
- Clark v. Dye (Minn. 1924)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This was an action of unlawful detainer brought under the provisions of Gr. S. 1894, § 6118, by plaintiff, to obtain restitution of certain real property demised and leased by him to defendant by written lease. There was an admitted breach of the covenant to pay rent, and the substance of defendant’s answer was that he owned and occupied a building on said premises, claiming the same as his statutory homestead, all of which was known to the plaintiff when the lease was executed. This was no defense, for if the building was defendant’s property, — and this seems to have been conceded, for the plaintiff made no reply, — he should remove it from the land as he would other property belonging to him. That he owned and occupied a building situated on the leased land gave him no right to unlawfully detain or to withhold restitution of the latter upon his failure to pay rent.
Defendant having admitted the material allegations of the com
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.