Minnesota Supreme Court, 1895

Roberts Manufacturing Co. v. Wright

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided November 4, 1895 · Start

62 Minn. 337; 64 N.W. 827; 1895 Minn. LEXIS 84 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Stevens, O^Brien, Gole db Albrecht, for appellant., Robertson Howard, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

King Features Syndicate v. Courrier (Iowa 1950)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

START, C. J.

The questions involved in this case were considered and decided in Roberts Mnfg. Co. v. Schlick, supra, p. 332, 64 N. W. 826. The evidence in this case differs from that in the *338Schlick Case, in that this defendant was one of the original promoters, and signed the original articles of association, was one of the original directors, and attended only two meetings of the board of directors, on April 18 and May 6, but never paid anything on the contract in question, and denies that he ever had anv knowledge of the making of it. We are of the opinion that the material findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court are sustained by the evidence.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.