Spriesterbach v. Schmidt

Minnesota Supreme Court
Spriesterbach v. Schmidt, 64 Minn. 211 (Minn. 1896)
66 N.W. 721; 1896 Minn. LEXIS 94
Buck

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 3 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Spriesterbach v. Schmidt

Opinion of the Court

BUCK, J.

This cause comes to this court on appeal from the judgment entered in the district court of Dakota county. The only testimony submitted to this court in the return is a stipulation of the respective counsel of certain facts, and a copy of the will of Gottfried Schmidt, which it is claimed were introduced in evidence on the trial in. the district court. There is no settled case, no bill of exceptions, and no certificate attached to the record by *212the trial judge, showing that the return, or any part thereof, is true and correct, or that it contains all or any of the evidence. Under these circumstances, we cannot presume that there was error ,in the trial court in ordering judgment. Error must be made to appear affirmatively.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
CHRISTINA SPRIESTERBACH and Others v. GOTTFRIED SCHMIDT and Others
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published