Minnesota Supreme Court, 1896

Kosko v. Hay

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided October 22, 1896 · Buck

66 Minn. 113; 68 N.W. 607; 1896 Minn. LEXIS 384 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

J. N. Becomes, for appellant., Albert H. Hall, for respondents.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Young v. Scoville (Iowa 1896)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BUCK, J.

This action was brought in justice court to recover damages for alleged negligence in partially destroying a buggy of the plaintiffs. Upon trial the defendant had judgment in his favor, but upon appeal to the district court, and a trial therein without a jury, the plaintiffs obtained an order for judgment in their favor. *114There are no material questions of law raised by the appeal; and the. weight of evidence, in the absence of manifest error, was a matter for the trial court to decide. Its finding was clearly supported by the evidence, and the order denying the motion for a new trial is affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.