Oelschlegel v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1962, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
30 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Kalz v. Winona & St. Peter Railway Co. (Minn. 1899)
- Walker Reorganized School District R-4 v. Flint (Mo. Ct. App. 1957)
- Caswell v. Minar Motor Co. (Minn. 1953)
- Muggenburg Ex Rel. Muggenburg v. Leighton (Minn. 1953)
- School District No. 135 v. McConnell (Minn. 1921)
- Hammer v. Narverud (Minn. 1919)
- Kommerstad v. Great Northern Railway Co. (Minn. 1914)
- J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. McCall (Minn. 1911)
- Hostager v. Northwest Paper Co. (Minn. 1910)
- Hodge v. Franklin Insurance (Minn. 1910)
- Peterson v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. (Minn. 1903)
- Sanderson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. (Minn. 1902)
- Green v. Smith (Iowa 1900)
- Savings Bank v. St. Paul Plow Co. (Minn. 1899)
- State ex rel. Junior College District of Sedalia v. Barker (Mo. 1967)
- Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington (Minn. 1962)
- Town of Burnsville v. City of Bloomington (Minn. 1962)
- State Ex Rel. Associated Master Barbers & Beauticians v. Eischen (Minn. 1957)
- In re Dissolution of School District No. 33 (Minn. 1953)
- State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of Mound (Minn. 1951)
- State Ex Rel. Lommen v. Gravlin (Minn. 1941)
- State Ex Rel. v. City Council of Benson (Minn. 1926)
- Town of Balkan v. Village of Buhl (Minn. 1924)
- State ex rel. Hilton v. Village of Kinney (Minn. 1920)
- State ex rel. Nordblum v. Burnquist (Minn. 1920)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries plaintiff had a verdict. Upon a settled case defendant corporation moved to set aside the verdict, and that judgment be entered in its favor notwithstanding the same.
This appeal is from an order denying the motion. No motion was made in the court below for a new trial. The order is not appealable. It was so suggested in Eckman v. Lauer, 67 Minn. 221, 69 N. W. 893, and it was so held in St. Anthony v. Graham, 67 Minn. 318, 69 N. W. 1077. The only difference in the facts between the case last cited and the present is that there the motion was in the alternative, — for judgment, or for a new trial in case judgment was not ordered; the court denying the first, but granting the alternative, request, and the appeal being taken from that part of the order which denied the motion for judgment,— while here the motion was not in the alternative, but simply for an order for judgment, which was denied, whereupon defendant appealed. Of course there is no substantial difference in the facts.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.