Fonda v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1918, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- State ex rel. Peery v. District Court (Minn. 1918)
- Nason v. Barrett (Minn. 1918)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is a motion under G. S. 1894, § 5517, to remit this case without payment of costs, on the ground that the respondent is unable to pay them. Our construction of the statute is that, whether the costs in any given case shall be paid as a condition precedent to remitting the case and its further prosecution in the court below, is a question exclusively for this court. If the case is remitted without the costs being paid, no matter whether it is on the application of the respondent or appellant, it goes down for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion of this court, without reference to the question whether the costs have been paid or not. Now it was admitted on the hearing of this motion that this case has already been, on the application of appellant, the prevailing party, remitted without payment of the costs, therefore it is un
Motion denied.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.