Fithian v. Weidenbokner
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1927, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Action brought to recover a balance claimed to be due on account of work and labor performed by plaintiff, as a clerk, for defendant, at her request. The trial was by the court without a jury, and its conclusion of law, upon the facts found, was that plaintiff was entitled to judgment for $127.97, with interest. There may have been an error of about $7 in plaintiff’s favor in the computation made by the court, but otherwise the findings were justified by the evidence.
No effort was made below to correct this error, and the order denying a new trial stands affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.