Spencer v. Stanley
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1949, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Coughlin v. Town of Rosemount (Minn. 1949)
- Kiebach v. Kiebach (Minn. 1948)
- Radabaugh v. Just (Minn. 1947)
- Hoyt v. Kittson County State Bank (Minn. 1930)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from an order denying a new trial. The paper book contains a notice of motion for a new trial, which does not state any grounds for the motion. This is fatal. See Clark v. Nelson Lumber Co., 34 Minn. 289, 25 N. W. 628.
But we will go further. The return does not show any notice of motion at all, and this is equally fatal.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.