Plymouth Clothing House v. Seymour
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1908, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Commercial Jewelry Co. v. Dente (Vt. 1910)
- West Publishing Co. v. De La Mott (Minn. 1908)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal herein under rule 14 for noncompliance with rule 11 (60 Minn. vi), as to the service of paper book and points and authorities. Noncompliance with this rule is admitted, but the appellant claims that the motion must be denied because the respondent has not served a written notice upon its attorneys requiring the return to be made, as provided by rule 4.
We have repeatedly decided and announced the decision from the
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.