Kipp v. Robinson
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1913, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lawton v. Barker (Minn. 1908)
- Downing v. Lucy (Minn. 1913)
- State Finance Co. v. Beck (N.D. 1906)
- State ex rel. National Fire Insurance v. Scott (Minn. 1904)
- Stewart v. Ridenour (Neb. 1914)
- Archer v. N. S. Tubbs Sheep Co. (S.D. 1910)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This action was brought under G. S. 1894, § 5821, to test the tax title under which the defendant claimed. The notice of the expiration of redemption given by the county auditor stated that the time for redemption from the tax sale would expire 90 days after service of the notice and proof thereof had been filed in his office. The case is controlled by State v. Nord, 73 Minn. 1, 75 N. W. 760.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.