Guiterman v. Saterlie
Guiterman v. Saterlie
76 Minn. 19; 78 N.W. 863; 1899 Minn. LEXIS 523
(Minnesota Reports)
Guiterman v. Saterlie
Opinion of the Court
The appellant’s brief contains no assignment of errors, as required by rule 9 of this court (60 Minn. v). Nor does the paper book contain the judgment appealed from, as required by said rule.
Neither does the paper book nor return contain a settled case or bill of exceptions, and the oral evidence printed in the paper book is not contained in the return.
For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.