Guiterman v. Saterlie
Minnesota Supreme Court
Guiterman v. Saterlie, 76 Minn. 19 (Minn. 1899)
78 N.W. 863; 1899 Minn. LEXIS 523
Buck
Guiterman v. Saterlie
Opinion of the Court
The appellant’s brief contains no assignment of errors, as required by rule 9 of this court (60 Minn. v). Nor does the paper book contain the judgment appealed from, as required by said rule.
Neither does the paper book nor return contain a settled case or bill of exceptions, and the oral evidence printed in the paper book is not contained in the return.
For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- AMBROSE GUITERMAN and Others v. OLE S. SATERLIE and Another
- Status
- Published