Von Hemert v. Taylor
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1930, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Brown (Minn. 1930)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. The mortgaged premises are described as the “south 100 feet of lots numbered 12 and 13, in block numbered 11, of St. Paul Proper.” The judgment of foreclosure orders that
“The mortgaged premises, * * or so mueh thereof as may be sufficient to satisfy the amount due to the plaintiff, which may be sold without material injury to the parties interested, be sold in one tract or parcel, at public auction,” etc.
The defendants Oscar L. and Nora W. Taylor appeal from the judgment, and urge as ground of error that it does not affirmatively appear that all of the mortgaged premises constitute but one tract or parcel, and that, therefore, the judgment ordering them sold as •one tract or parcel is erroneous. It is well settled that error cannot be presumed, but must be made affirmatively to appear. The fact that parts of the premises are rented to different tenants, whose
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.