Reibeling v. Reibeling
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1945, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hove v. Hove (Minn. 1945)
- Thorem v. Thorem (Minn. 1933)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appellant sued for a divorce from her husband on the grounds of cruel and inhuman treatment and habitual drunkenness. Respondent denied the charges and filed a cross bill for a divorce from his wife on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The trial court found against the contentions of both parties, denying either of them relief. Appellant appealed from the decision, upon the ground that, as against herself, it was not supported by the facts, and that she was entitled to a divorce, especially upon the charge of drunkenness. The record discloses an unfortunate condition of incompatibility, but we agree with the trial judge that both parties are at fault, and that neither of them is entitled to relief at the hands of the court.
Order affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.