Minnesota Supreme Court, 1902

Kistler v. Johnson

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided June 20, 1902

86 Minn. 444; 90 N.W. 1133; 1902 Minn. LEXIS 536 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

'Trajford N. Jayne, for appellant., Welch, Eayne & Eubachelc, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Potokar (Wis. 1944)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.'

This action was brought to recover compensation for medical services performed by' the plaintiff, alleged to have been at the special instance and request of defendant. The allegations of the complaint were denied, and a verdict was returned for plaintiff.

*445The evidence supports the verdict, and the various assignments of error in most respects refer to immaterial and collateral matters and do not warrant consideration. We find no reversible error.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.