Town of Louriston v. Board of County Commissioners
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1949, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- County of Hennepin v. County of Houston (Minn. 1949)
- Dodge County v. Diers (Neb. 1903)
- State v. Rivers (Minn. 1939)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This action was commenced for the purpose of recovering the expense connected with the quarantine and care of the Cherry family, and, the trial court having sustained a demurrer to the complaint, an appeal was taken from such order.
The facts are stated in the opinion in the case of Town of Louriston v. Board of Co. Commrs. of Swift Co., supra, page 91, and the decision in that case necessarily determined the decision in this, and, for the reasons set forth in that opinion, respondent county is liable.
Order reversed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.