Minnesota Supreme Court, 1903

Clavin v. Semple

Clavin v. Semple
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided November 20, 1903
90 Minn. 491; 97 N.W. 1117; 1903 Minn. LEXIS 728 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

Charles W. Scrutchin, for appellant., Bailey & McDonald, for respondents.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1951, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Clavin v. Semple

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover $75 alleged to be due as rent under a certain lease. Plaintiffs had judgment in the court below, and defendant appealed from an order denying a new trial.

Though there are no assignments of error in this case, we have examined the evidence for the purpose of determining whether the findings of the trial court are so clearly palpably against the, evidence as to warrant a reversal. Our conclusion is that the findings are sustained, and "the order appealed from is affirmed. By considering the merits of this case in the absence of assignments of error, we do not wish to be understood as establishing a precedent which will require us to do so at any time in the future. The rule requiring assignments should be observed.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.