State v. Ames

Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Ames, 93 Minn. 187 (Minn. 1904)
100 N.W. 889; 1904 Minn. LEXIS 671

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 2 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State v. Ames

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion to amend the judgment herein remanding this case to the district court, so as to conform to the statute in such case made and provided. The judgment is not technically a compliance with the statute, in that it does not, in express terms, direct a new trial, but the appeal was from a judgment which was reversed on the ground that the verdict and judgment were not sustained by the evidence, and case remanded to the district court. The necessary legal effect of such action was to remand the case for a new trial. It follows that the proposed amendment, even if it were conceded that we had jurisdiction to make it, is unnecessary, and therefore the motion is denied.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE v. ALBERT A. AMES
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published