Minnesota Supreme Court, 1906

Pieper v. Maclaren

Pieper v. Maclaren
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided July 27, 1906
99 Minn. 513; 108 N.W. 1118; 1906 Minn. LEXIS 477 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

R. A. Walsh, for appellant., Allen & Straight, for respondent.

Pieper v. Maclaren

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Since this ease was argued and determined by the trial court, the decision in Coffman v. London & N. W. Am. M. Co. has been filed, 98 Minn. 416, 108 N. W. 840. Under that decision, the defendant not having a deed, was not entitled to judgment establishing title. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial should therefore have been granted.

Order reversed and a hew trial granted.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.