Cornell v. Hendrickson
Minnesota Supreme Court
Cornell v. Hendrickson, 100 Minn. 544 (Minn. 1907)
110 N.W. 1132; 1907 Minn. LEXIS 726
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Cornell v. Hendrickson
Opinion of the Court
Action to recover damages for an alleged indecent assault, in which plaintiff had a verdict for $1,250.
The trial court granted a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence and also that the damages were excessive, from which plaintiff appealed. The order is affirmed, under the rule of Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), and Mohr v. Williams, 95 Minn. 261, 104 N. W. 12, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 439.
Order affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- LENA CORNELL v. IRA HENDRICKSON
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published