Minnesota Supreme Court, 1907

Cornell v. Hendrickson

Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided March 1, 1907

100 Minn. 544; 110 N.W. 1132; 1907 Minn. LEXIS 726 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

J. N. Johnson, for appellant., Ole Ostensoe, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1913, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Melin v. Stuart (Minn. 1913)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Action to recover damages for an alleged indecent assault, in which plaintiff had a verdict for $1,250.

The trial court granted a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was not sustained by the evidence and also that the damages were excessive, from which plaintiff appealed. The order is affirmed, under the rule of Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), and Mohr v. Williams, 95 Minn. 261, 104 N. W. 12, 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 439.

Order affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.