State ex rel. Berg v. Village Council

Minnesota Supreme Court
State ex rel. Berg v. Village Council, 107 Minn. 441 (Minn. 1909)
120 N.W. 894; 1909 Minn. LEXIS 583
Elliott

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State ex rel. Berg v. Village Council

Opinion of the Court

ELLIOTT, J.

The village council of the village of Blackduck, after notice and a hearing, revoked a liquor license held by the relator, Berg. On the application of Berg, what the appellant calls a writ of certiorari issued out of the district court for the purpose of bringing up the record for review. After a hearing the court quashed the so-called writ, and Berg appealed to this court.

No proper writ of certiorari was issued. What passed by that name in the proceedings was no more than a subpoena duces tecum. It was directed to certain individuals by name, who were described as the president and the recorder, respectively, of the village. The writ should have been directed to the common council of the village of Blackduck, and commanded it to make return of its proceedings in the matter of the revocation of the license. See Dunnell, Pr. § 864?.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE ex rel. JOHN BERG v. VILLAGE COUNCIL OF BLACKDUCK
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published