Minnesota Supreme Court, 1909

Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth

Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 21, 1909
108 Minn. 83; 121 N.W. 212; 1909 Minn. LEXIS 636 (Minnesota Reports)

Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order for judgment, and also from an order refusing to grant a motion to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law. An order for judgment is not appealable. Ryan v. Kranz, 25 Minn. 362; Croft v. Miller, 26 Minn. 317, 4 N. W. 45; St. Anthony Falls Bank v. Graham, 67 Minn. 318, 69 N. W. 1077.

An order denying a motion to amend the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law is not appealable. Lamprey v. St. Paul & Chicago Ry. Co., 86 Minn. 509, 515, 91 N. W. 29, and cases cited.

Appeal dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.