Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth
Minnesota Supreme Court
Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth, 108 Minn. 83 (Minn. 1909)
121 N.W. 212; 1909 Minn. LEXIS 636
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order for judgment, and also from an order refusing to grant a motion to amend the findings of fact and conclusions of law. An order for judgment is not appealable. Ryan v. Kranz, 25 Minn. 362; Croft v. Miller, 26 Minn. 317, 4 N. W. 45; St. Anthony Falls Bank v. Graham, 67 Minn. 318, 69 N. W. 1077.
An order denying a motion to amend the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law is not appealable. Lamprey v. St. Paul & Chicago Ry. Co., 86 Minn. 509, 515, 91 N. W. 29, and cases cited.
Appeal dismissed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- NIKANNIS COMPANY and Another v. CITY OF DULUTH
- Cited By
- 6 cases
- Status
- Published