Minnesota Supreme Court, 1909

Spurr v. Spurr

Spurr v. Spurr
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided May 14, 1909 · Cubiam
108 Minn. 521; 121 N.W. 121; 1909 Minn. LEXIS 749 (Minnesota Reports)

Counsel

O. D. & R. D. O’Brien, for appellant., Owen Morris, for respondent.

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1914, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

Spurr v. Spurr

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cubiam.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the district court of the county of Ramsey denying his motion to set aside its decision and findings. The record contains no bill of exceptions, nor certificate of the trial judge that the record contains everything offered or considered on the hearing of the motion, nor the certificate of the clerk of the district court that the return contains a true and correct transcript of all the records and files in the action.

Held, following Hospes v. Northwestern Mnfg. & Car Co., 41 Minn. 256, 43 N. W. 180, that the order appealed from must be, and is, affirmed.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.