Murray Cure Institutes Co. v. Ward

Minnesota Supreme Court
Murray Cure Institutes Co. v. Ward, 108 Minn. 527 (Minn. 1909)
121 N.W. 878; 1909 Minn. LEXIS 757
Pee

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 4 citing opinions

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

Murray Cure Institutes Co. v. Ward

Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the county of Koochiching.

The only question presented by the record is whether the trial court erred in denying the plaintiff’s motion for a change of the place of trial for the convenience of witnesses. Such a motion is directed to the discretion of the trial court. Sims v. American Steel Barge Co., 56 Minn. 68, 57 N. W. 322, 45 Am. St. 451. Upon a full consideration of the record, we are of the opinion that the court did not abuse its discretion in this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
MURRAY CURE INSTITUTES COMPANY v. C. R. WARD and Another
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published