Murray Cure Institutes Co. v. Ward
Can I rely on this case?
Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.
(as of 9/30/2026)
Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 1950, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.
Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- King v. Schultz (Minn. 1950)
- Simons v. Munch (Minn. 1911)
- Richmond v. Whitaker (Iowa 1934)
- Simons v. Munch (Minn. 1914)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the county of Koochiching.
The only question presented by the record is whether the trial court erred in denying the plaintiff’s motion for a change of the place of trial for the convenience of witnesses. Such a motion is directed to the discretion of the trial court. Sims v. American Steel Barge Co., 56 Minn. 68, 57 N. W. 322, 45 Am. St. 451. Upon a full consideration of the record, we are of the opinion that the court did not abuse its discretion in this case.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.