State ex rel. Hassing v. Quinn
Minnesota Supreme Court
State ex rel. Hassing v. Quinn, 108 Minn. 528 (Minn. 1909)
121 N.W. 898; 1909 Minn. LEXIS 759
Can I rely on this case?
Yes — no negative treatment found
- —
Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.
State ex rel. Hassing v. Quinn
Opinion of the Court
Conceding that relator properly raised the question by appearing specially and objecting to the petition, there is no merit in the claim that the description of the lands was defective. A description of the lands proposed to be drained is all the statute requires. This does not mean a description by subdivision to correspond with individual ownership; and if an entire section is within the-district, it may be described as a section, although the subdivisions are owned by different persons.
Writ discharged.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE ex rel. GEORGE HASSING v. JAMES H. QUINN and Others
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published