State ex rel. Hassing v. Quinn

Minnesota Supreme Court
State ex rel. Hassing v. Quinn, 108 Minn. 528 (Minn. 1909)
121 N.W. 898; 1909 Minn. LEXIS 759

Can I rely on this case?

Yes — no negative treatment found

Based on 1 citing opinion

Analysis generated from citing opinions in this archive. Not legal advice.

State ex rel. Hassing v. Quinn

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Conceding that relator properly raised the question by appearing specially and objecting to the petition, there is no merit in the claim that the description of the lands was defective. A description of the lands proposed to be drained is all the statute requires. This does not mean a description by subdivision to correspond with individual ownership; and if an entire section is within the-district, it may be described as a section, although the subdivisions are owned by different persons.

Writ discharged.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE ex rel. GEORGE HASSING v. JAMES H. QUINN and Others
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published